Court Rules Police No Longer Need Warrants To Use Hidden Cameras



Guess again if you think the police need a warrant before doing any sneaky surveillance. A federal judge has agreed that placing covert cameras hidden from the public is a fine practice for cops — and one that doesn’t require a court’s approval.

US District Judge William Griesbach ruled this month that he sees nothing wrong with the unauthorized installation of surveillance cameras in order to catch suspected criminals. The George W. Bush-appointed justice was tasked with weighing in on the procedure federal law enforcement agents relied on to nab two suspected weed growers earlier this year, and decided in his legally-binding opinion that officers can carry out clandestine surveillance without having a judge authorize any warrants.

Although the US Constitution’s Fourth Amendment grants “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,” Judge Griesbach said Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) officers didn’t violate the law when they installed multiple surveillance devices to monitor two Wisconsin men in a wooden area near their home.

Agents with the DEA hadn’t bothered to ask for permission and decided to take it upon themselves to place clandestine monitoring traps adjacent to where they assumed Manuel Mendoza and Marco Magana of Green Bay, Wisconsin had been harvesting marijuana for mass distribution. The footage collected by the cameras alleged to be of the culprits were used to file hefty criminal charges that could come with life in prison if a guilty verdict is returned by a jury, but attorneys for the defense argue that the officers violated the Fourth Amendment by spying on the suspects.

When the counsel for Mr. Mendoza filed a first motion to suppress the evidence in September, he informed the court that “videos from this surveillance device that have been turned over to undersigned counsel show consecutive dates which indicate that, prior to receiving judicial authorization, the digital surveillance camera was recording for seventy-nine and a half (79 ½) hours.”

“Despite the failure to address this issue, the Ninth District Court of Appeals believed that ‘the legislative history provides ample evidence that Congress intended through Title III to provide strict regulation of all highly intrusive forms of surveillance,’” the defense wrote.

According to court filings, the surveillance occurred beginning on July 12, 2012, but United States Magistrate Judge James Sickel did not sign a warrant to allow the installation of the cameras until three days later.

“Even though surveillance was later authorized, the surveillance recordings obtained prior to the authorization should be suppressed as they were clearly obtained contrary to the governing

statutes. Because the agents did no more here than they might have done with prior judicial sanction does not mean that the Court should ‘retroactively validate their conduct,’” the defense added.

Elsewhere in the motion, the attorneys for Mr. Mendoza note that while legal precedent exists to excuse the necessity of a warrant in some cases, “The situation at present clearly does not meet the criteria of an emergency that would allow surveillance to take place prior to the authorization of a warrant. There was no indication that national security was threatened, that there was immediate danger of death or serious injury to any person, or characteristics of organized crime.”

When the government responded to the attorney’s call to can the footage from court filings on September 19, US Attorney James Santelle denied that order and said no rules were broken by investigators because the suspects couldn’t rightfully expect a right to privacy on the land in question where police later found dozens of marijuana plants. Santelle cited an earlier opinion to note, “officers entering an open field do not trespass because an open field is not an area enumerated as protected under the Fourth Amendment.” Regardless of ownership in regards to the property, he wrote, “Put simply, open fields and woods, though private lands, are not ‘persons, houses, papers, and effects’” protected under the Constitution.

Brett Reetz, Magana’s attorney, says, “That one’s actions could be recorded on their own property, even if the property is not within the curtilage, is contrary to society’s concept of privacy.” Additionally, he cites the “No Trespassing” signs that the defendants had posted throughout the property, which was fenced in with a locked gate.

US Magistrate Judge William Callahan opined on the case on October 9, ruling “The Supreme Court has upheld the use of technology as a substitute for ordinary police surveillance.” Most recently, Judge Griesbach agreed to adhere by that recommendation and has ruled that there was nothing wrong with spying on the men since the officers were performing their official duty. reports that a jury trial for the suspects has been scheduled for January 22, 2013. According to the Peshtigo Times, if convicted the criminals could face a mandatory minimum of 10 years to life imprisonment, as well as $10 million in fines.



Like A Thief In The Night: Barack Obama Signs New Executive Order



On Oct. 26, President Obama signed a new Executive Order which expands the role and scope of Homeland Security in states and areas across the country. This order, which establishes a new Security Partnership Council, will have far reaching effects in the overall mission of Homeland Security, and for state and local areas that interact with the Federal agency.

Economically, the Establishing the White House Homeland Security Partnership Council Executive Order will increase funding and resources to state and local governments to fulfill Homeland Security programs and doctrines, as well as increase Federal oversight in the implementation of directives tied to the agencies mission.

The purpose of this order is to maximize the Federal Government’s ability to develop local partnerships in the United States to support homeland security priorities. Partnerships are collaborative working relationships in which the goals, structure, and roles and responsibilities of the relationships are mutually determined.

There is established a White House Homeland Security Partnership Council (Council) to foster local partnerships — between the Federal Government and the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, community-based organizations, and State, local, tribal, and territorial government and law enforcement — to address homeland security challenges.

Sec. 3. Mission and Function of the Council and Steering Committee

(ii) promote homeland security priorities and opportunities for collaboration between Federal Government field offices and State, local, tribal, and territorial stakeholders;

(iii) advise and confer with State, local, tribal, and territorial stakeholders and agencies interested in expanding or building local homeland security partnerships; –



Read Full Story:

Documents Show “Hurricane Sandy” Was Predicted In A Drill In 1997? (Video)


This Is Seriously Creepy!

Do You Believe There Is Any Truth To This? Click The Link Below To See The Full Article!


Alex Jones Accused Of Secretly Throwing Illuminati Hand Gestures In Bilderberg Video


Alex Jones may not be aware of the heat he’s receiving for the “Alex Jones Drive-By Bullhorning at Bilderberg 2012″ Video. The video shows Alex Jones outside the Westfields Marriott hotel in Chantilly, Virginia bullhorning outside the window. The scene in the video created quite a storm for not only the elite, but viewers who claim Alex Jones gave “Illuminati” hand gestures around 00:06 & 00:21. Check The Video Out!


Some Viewers Comments





What Do You Think?





Massive Explosion Rocks Lower Manhattan Con-Ed Plant During Hurricane Sandy Impact

Tatiana Moroz Releases New Music Video Directed by WeAreChange



Liberty Singer


WAC: Obama Supporters Actually Hate Obama’s Policies